Prediction of Maja Zivec Skulj vs Tessa Price Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. Zivec Skulj vs T. Price

Maja Zivec Skulj

GER

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

101

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Tessa Price

RSA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

101

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Skulj 1 - 0 Price

They have played 3 sets in total, with Maja Zivec Skulj winning 2 and Tessa Price winning 1. The last match between Maja Zivec Skulj and Tessa Price was at the ITF Rebecq, 22-08-1988, Round: R4, Surface: Clay, with Maja Zivec Skulj getting the victory 6-4 0-6 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Skulj	1
Price	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R4) ITF Rebecq(08-22-88)

Stats

Maja Zivec Skulj

Tessa Price

M. Z. Skulj vs T. Price H2H Profile

M. Z. Skulj	Stats	T. Price
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
56.03% (144-113)	Career Total W/L	61.47% (134-84)
1	Clay	0
3	Titles	9
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. Z. Skulj vs T. Price Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Maja Zivec Skulj has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Tessa Price has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Maja Zivec Skulj, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tessa Price has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Maja Zivec Skulj has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tessa Price has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Maja Zivec Skulj has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Tessa Price winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Maja Zivec Skulj has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 105/71), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 38% (W/L 3/5). Tessa Price has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 98/53), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 36% (W/L 4/7).
Player level: In the last year, Maja Zivec Skulj has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Tessa Price has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Maja Zivec Skulj winning 1 times and Tessa Price being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Maja Zivec Skulj winning 2 and Tessa Price winning 1.
The last match between Maja Zivec Skulj and Tessa Price was at the ITF Rebecq, 22-08-1988, Round: R4, Surface: Clay, with Maja Zivec Skulj getting the victory 6-4 0-6 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Maja Zivec Skulj has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Tessa Price has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Maja Zivec Skulj has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tessa Price has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Maja Zivec Skulj has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tessa Price has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Maja Zivec Skulj vs Tessa Price Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Z. Skulj vs T. Price H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. Z. Skulj	Stats	T. Price
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
12	Games Won	14
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

M. Z. Skulj Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Salzburg 25K - 09-12-1996
R3 Sandra KleinovaS. Kleinova	L	4-6 6-3 6-2	Stats
Bad Gogging 25K - 11-11-1996
R4 Magdalena FeistelM. Feistel	W	7-6 6-7 6-2	Stats
R3 Patty Van AckerP. Van	W	6-2 6-0	Stats
Raluca SanduR. Sandu	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
Stockholm 25K - 28-10-1996
R3 Barbara SchwartzB. Schwartz	L	6-2 7-5	Stats

View All

T. Price Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Unknown Tournament - 24-06-1996
Q1 Tara SnyderT. Snyder	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
Eastbourne - 18-06-1996
Q1 Meghann ShaughnessyM. Shaughnessy	L	6-4 6-0	Stats
Birmingham - 10-06-1996
Q1 Nicole PrattN. Pratt	L	6-4 4-2 RET	Stats
Guimaraes 10K - 30-04-1996
R4 Diane AsensioD. Asensio	W	6-2 6-1	Stats
R3 Julia Carballal FernandezJ. Carballal	W	6-1 6-1	Stats

View All

M. Z. Skulj vs T. Price Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. Z. Skulj	Stats	T. Price
56.03% (144/113)	YTD Win/Loss	61.47% (134/84)
53.99% (325/277)	Sets Win/Loss	60.12% (303/201)
52.06% (2813/2590)	Games Win/Loss	55.03% (2502/2045)
45.45% (20/24)	Hard Win/Loss	64.90% (98/53)
59.66% (105/71)	Clay Win/Loss	36.36% (4/7)
55.56% (15/12)	Indoor Hard W/L	64.29% (9/5)
50.00% (1/1)	Grass Win/Loss	54.17% (13/11)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
366.86	Average Opponent Rank	421.64
0.00% (0/2)	Slam W/L	25.00% (1/3)
64.67% (108/59)	Challenger W/L	71.32% (97/39)
37.50% (3/5)	Futures W/L	55.56% (10/8)
56% (141/251)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	62% (133/216)
0% (0/0)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/1)
59% (10/17)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	52% (11/21)
57% (54/95)	Deciding Set Win %	48% (33/69)
80% (148/118)	1st Set Won, Won Match	90% (125/112)
20% (148/29)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	10% (125/13)
22% (108/24)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	23% (92/21)